Содержание
This took many by surprise, but the roots could be seen in the Project Katana, Microsoft’s OWIN (Open Web Interface for .NET) implementation for .NET. OWIN and Katana were Microsoft’s initial attempt at modernizing ASP.NET by taking inspiration from the likes of Ruby and Node. It tried to provide a lightweight web platform (no System.Web) built on best practices learned from other frameworks that could be hosted on any server. An entire type system for JavaScript was introduced, which allowed developers to write JavaScript code using types. As we all know, this idea would be later implemented again and perfected with the release of TypeScript.
- We also shouldn’t forget that .NET 3.5 introduced LINQ to the delight of many, including ASP.NET developers, who even got a specific LinqDataSource control.
- It was with the release in 2005 of the .NET Framework 2.0 that the framework took a big step forward and came of age.
- Before the page HTML is sent to the browser, the server encoded the state of the page controls into a Base64 encoded string which was included as a hidden form field.
- They would change once more with ASP.NET Core 1.0 as part of the unified dotnet CLI, becoming subcommands like dotnet list, dotnet restore, dotnet publish, dotnet run, etc.
- With the built-in configuration information, Asp.Net is easy to deploy.
Drag-and-drop server controls and auto-deployment are only a couple of the features this versatile tool offers. Version 2.1.0 was released in May 2018 and amongst many features and improvements, it finally brought the rewritten SignalR framework into ASP.NET Core. This is a simpler, more performant and lightweight version of SignalR, designed to scale and take advantage of .NET Core. Looking past the middleware concept, we also had a dependency injection framework built-in, with the dependency inversion pattern applied throughout the framework. There was also a completely different project startup and setup that reflected the new lightweight hosting approach and the middleware-based pipeline.
Finally, Asp.Net reduces the line of code needed to develop large applications. With the built-in configuration information, Asp.Net is easy to deploy. There is no need to register components because the configuration information is built-in. These applications are language-independent, so it allows you to select the language that is best for you.
Xml Tutorials
He showed the new runtime in action, highlighted how NuGet was used to manage all the dependencies and gave us a glimpse of the new project.json project file. Web 2.0 introduced the need for more dynamic websites that increasingly needed to take advantage of client-side scripting. This trend continued through the first half of the decade and entered an exponential growth when these features became a common and expected feature of modern websites, particularly after its adoption in Google products.
Microsoft adopted a schedule that released major new framework versions every two years, with all the pieces including ASP.NET upgraded at the same time. Microsoft still had a large base of VB6, ActiveX and classic ASP programmers around that had to move into their new .NET platform. As you can imagine, abundant materials were produced to help with the transition, like this series of articles collected in their official docs. As mentioned earlier, XML in general and XML-based Web Services were a huge deal back then. ASP.NET had a web services offering over HTTP and the .NET framework came with a more general purpose .NET Remoting, the predecessor to WCF.
When developers tried to keep up with the increasing expectations for web applications they could find themselves working around the framework rather than in the way the framework intended. It wasn’t until a year later when .NET Framework 3.5 was released in November of 2007, that ASP.NET received new features. The most significant one was the fact that Microsoft AJAX was now part of the framework.
Web Services interaction between different platforms like .NET and Java was a big deal. As you can see in Figure 2, the framework is designed assuming most of the work would be done by the server, with the client mostly rendering the HTML documents and https://globalcloudteam.com/ issuing new GET/POST requests. This was a sign of the times, since clients were not as powerful, nor browsers as advanced as they are today. Microsoft released ASP.NET to the world as part of the 1.0 release of the .NET framework during January 2002.
With .NET you are not limited to JIT but have the option AOT if you want to eliminate startup delays. ASP.NET greatly decreases the amount of code needed to build massive applications with tighter security and improved performance. These applications offer improved efficiency by taking advantage of early linking, just-in-time compilation, native optimization, and caching services straight out of the box.
Asp Net Mvc
Web Parts allowed users to personalize websites, an idea like the iGoogle or My Yahoo! portals of the time. Server Controls could be used as Web Parts , which users could add, remove and customize from their portal-like page. Achieving a consistent look and feel was easier after the introduction of Master Pages, a concept close to the layouts seen in ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Core. The intercepting filter pattern provides similar functionality to the Filters in ASP.NET MVC or even the Middleware in ASP.NET Core. There are also HTML Server Controls, which are directly related with HTML elements and whose intention is for the code-behind class to have access to them. There is one in the earlier example, the span mySpan, with its corresponding variable of the code-behind class.
Today, when ASP.NET developers start working on a new web project, they have two options in front of them – ASP.NET web forms or ASP.NET MVC framework. With every passing day, companies are shifting gear from the old ASP.NET framework to the new MVC framework. This is because ASP.NET MVC comes with a lot of features that are why use asp.net extremely popular with developers. Of course, this means that the MVC framework has a higher initial cost to put up with. The no longer experimental Blazor framework will partially ship with .NET Core 3.0. This is explained by the fact that the server-side model of Blazor will be extracted and renamed as Server-side Blazor .
System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe reference directly on the Host project, for netstandard the package is NETStandard.Library.NETFramework or installing .NET Core 2.0 SDK. Tutorials, references, and examples are constantly reviewed to avoid errors, but we cannot warrant full correctness of all content. While using W3Schools, you agree to have read and accepted our terms of use,cookie and privacy policy. ASP was introduced in 1998 as Microsoft’s first server side scripting language. When a browser requests an ASP or ASP.NET file, the ASP engine reads the file, executes any code in the file, and returns the result to the browser.
Programming
The term AJAX coined in early 2005 quickly became a buzzword mentioned everywhere and the next big thing in web development. New dependencies based on SQL server were introduced, developers could now write their own cache dependency implementations and dynamic parts were allowed in cached pages. In fact, controls became one of the preferred ways to expand ASP.NET in the community, and started an industry of 3rd party control vendors. Even though it was a success, the .NET framework was still in its infancy and in much need of maturing and refining.
ASP.NET framework reduces higher costs along with creating custom web applications with all features. View state – ASP.NET supports view State whereas the MVC framework does not. More control – with the MVC framework, we have more control over CSS, HTML, and JavaScript relative to the older frameworks. Tightly coupled – CS page or code-behind file and ASPX page is tightly coupled.
Win Forms was designed to be the successor to VB6 for developing Windows desktop applications, providing a RAD experience around a forms designer in Visual Studio that would be familiar to VB6 developers. Its name also suggested this new framework was the successor to the classic ASP scripting framework. Programs like Visual Studio .NET and Visual Web Developer allow Web developers to create dynamic websites using a visual interface. Of course, programmers can write their own code and scripts and incorporate it into ASP.NET websites as well. Though it often seen as a successor to Microsoft’s ASP programming technology, ASP.NET also supports Visual Basic.NET, JScript .NET and open-source languages like Python and Perl. ASP.NET is built on the .NET framework, which provides an application program interface for software programmers.
The sole purpose of this release was to introduce the trio of XML-based frameworks WCF , WPF and WF . It was released separately from the .NET Framework, as a standalone installer that added Microsoft AJAX to ASP.NET 2.0. Before it, developers had to wait for the 2-year release cycle of the .NET Framework in order to get new features. The ASP.NET framework provided a set of controls that could be used on each page. Introduction of view state helps in maintaining state of the controls automatically between the postbacks events. The Common Language Specification data types in all .Net applications are similar, so no Type conversion is necessary when calling.Net methods, C++, C# from Visual Basic, or Vice Versa.
Microsoft’s Internet Information Services Web server is by far the most common platform for ASP.NET websites. While there are some open-source options available for Linux-based systems, these alternatives often provide less than full support for ASP.NET applications. Although Mono had been around for quite some time (version 1.0 released in 2004), this was the first time Microsoft would build a cross-platform .NET product! In a follow-up blogpost he shared preliminary details of the new architecture, including its new runtime , new HTTP abstractions, simplified hosting and the plans to unify MVC/Web API.
And funnily enough, with Razor Components being part of ASP.NET Core 3.0, we have gone a full circle again towards a page model encapsulating template and logic, able to react to UX events. Although this time it is actually running in the same process, except a small client in the browser, rendering the DOM updates pushed through a SignalR connection. It seemed like the ASP.NET team had finally achieved its long-term vision with the One ASP.NET idea and its different frameworks. The team was busy taking a much deeper look at the framework and even at its .NET fundamental roots. They even decided to code name ASP.NET vNext internally instead of its public name ASP.NET 5. While the work on Microsoft AJAX neared its initial release,.NET Framework 3.0 released in November of 2006.
This model would be immediately familiar to developers used to working with desktop applications where the view and page controller run as part of the same process. However, it hid from them the fact that client and server were separated over a network, one stateless by nature. It was then that Microsoft released the .NET framework 1.0 alongside Visual Studio.NET, with ASP.NET Web Forms being a core part of the package. This gave developers of the Microsoft platform a much better way of building web applications than the previous mixture of classic ASP, ActiveX controls and VB6 DLLs.
Early Development Stages, Asp Net Vnext
Its approach was considerably different from ASP.NET, providing a lightweight MVC framework that accepted the strengths and limitations of the web and explicitly tried not to get in the developer’s way. In comparison, it made ASP.NET look old and heavy, criticized by those seeking a better way of developing web applications and often cited as the counter-example. The focus on server-side controls and declarative programming through bindings, hid even more the realities of the web from developers.
The Design Of Web Forms
Seeing the early attempt, it is interesting nonetheless, and I wonder what lessons were learned that were later used during the TypeScript development . Overall, ASP.NET succeeded in its objectives of providing a model closer to desktop development and a RAD platform for web development. However, its stateful model over a stateless network combined with an abstraction that hid the web from developers, ended up hurting the framework in the long term.
Net Framework, Visual Studio And C#
Daniel Jimenez Garciais a passionate software developer with 10+ years of experience who likes to share his knowledge and has been publishing articles since 2016. He started his career as a Microsoft developer focused mainly on .NET, C# and SQL Server. In the latter half of his career he worked on a broader set of technologies and platforms with a special interest for .NET Core, Node.js, Vue, Python, Docker and Kubernetes. At the same time, things were beginning to change for both developers and web users. Ruby on Rails had been released in 2004 and had a huge impact on the web development world.
Another important addition in ASP.NET Core 2.0 was the introduction of IHostingService. This brings a very convenient and straightforward way to run background processes alongside your web application. This was great for scenarios that don’t require complex distributed architectures. You can read more about these and other features in one of our earlier articles on ASP.NET Core 2.0. This added to the framework the possibility to use the MVVM (Model View View-Model) pattern that developers can mix and match with the traditional MVC approach according to their needs.
ASP.NET Core merges ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET Web API, and ASP.NET Web Pages into one application framework. Both technologies enable computer code to be executed by an Internet server. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. ASP.NET provides full support for XML, CSS and other new as well as established web standards. Please use ide.geeksforgeeks.org, generate link and share the link here.
Use these concepts to deepen your existing knowledge of C# and .NET, to have a solid grasp of the latest in C# and .NET OR to crack your next .NET Interview. It was the end of the year 2007 and we had a mature .NET framework after 3 major revisions, which included a very capable ASP.NET framework. We also shouldn’t forget that .NET 3.5 introduced LINQ to the delight of many, including ASP.NET developers, who even got a specific LinqDataSource control.
The View State was improved and reduced in size, one of the criticisms towards ASP.NET. The concept of “Control State” was introduced to separate the absolute minimum data required for a control to function from the rest of the View State. This would greatly help Win Forms and Web Forms to separate the designer code generated by Visual Studio from the actual code-behind written by the user. In 2003, the .NET Framework 1.1 was released and ASP.NET received the Mobile Controls amongst other minor updates. It was with the release in 2005 of the .NET Framework 2.0 that the framework took a big step forward and came of age. As we look back to its early design and years, it might be surprising to see how concepts like MVC, Web Services, JSON or JavaScript types were considered, discussed and/or introduced into ASP.NET earlier than you might remember.